Evaluasi Pembelajaran IPA Model Discovery Learning Menggunakan Model Countenance Stake

Authors

  • Putri Rahadian Dyah Kusumawati IAIN Pekalongan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21927/literasi.2020.11(1).20-31

Abstract

This research aims were: (1) the quality of preparation, (2) the quality of implementation, and (3) the learning outcomes of students in application of learning science in Curriculum 2013. This research was model evaluation research based on Countenance Stake model. The population in this study was teachers and students in seventh grade of Junior High School. This research was conducted in Junior High School that was applying Curriculum 2013 in Bantul region. The teacher sample was determined by purposive sampling technique. The student sample was determined by proportional random sampling technique. The data were collected using document preparation review sheets, classroom observations, student and teacher questionnaires, and document of student learning outcomes. The data were analyzed by descriptive quantitative technique. The results indicated a strong concerned between the quality of teacher preparation, implementation and student learning outcomes. The result of this research show that: (1) the quality of preparation of learning science in Curriculum 2013 was categorized good (t-score = 50,51), (2) the quality of implementation of learning science in Curriculum 2013 was categorized good (t-score = 51,32), (3) the result of student learning outcomes was categorized good (t-score = 50,59).

References

Alfieri, L., Brooks, P. J., Aldrich, N. J., & Tenenbaum, H. R. (2011). Does Discovery-Based Instruction Enhance Learning? Journal of Educational Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021017

Apriyadi, A. (3 Januari 2016). Jumlah sekolah terapkan kurikulum 2013 di Bantul ditargetkan bertambah. Tribun Jogja [Versi Elektronik]. Diambil tanggal 3 Maret 2016 dari http://jogja.tribunnews.com/2016/01/03/.

Arend, R. I. (2014). Learning to teach (10th ed). New York: McGraw-Hill international Edition.

Arifin, Z. (2014). Evaluasi pembelajaran prinsip, teknik, prosedur. Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya Offset.

Champine, S. L., Duffy, S. M., & Perkins, J. R. (2009). Jerome S . Bruner ‟ s Discovery Learning Model as the Theoretical Basis of Light Bounces Lesson. Educational Psychologist.

Collette, A.T & Chiapetta. (1994). Science instruction in the middle and secondary schools. New York: Macmillan Publishing Company.

Dewantari, P.M.A & Hariyatmi (2015). Identifikasi kesulitan guru ipa dalam melaksanakan pembelajaran kurikulum 2013 di SMP Negeri 1 Wonogiri Tahun Pelajaran 2014/2015. Artikel Publikasi Ilmiah, Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta, Surakarta.

Fadilah, N. U., & Suparwoto, S. (2016). Keterlaksanaan pembelajaran fisika implementasi kurikulum 2013 berdasarkan latar belakang akademik guru di MAN DIY. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan IPA.

https://doi.org/10.21831/jipi.v2i1.8380

Fitzpatrick, J.L., Sanders, J.R., & Worthen, B.R. (2011). Program evaluation: alternative approaches and practical guidelines. New Jersey: Pearson Education.

Hakim, M. L. (2015). Implementasi pembelajaran IPA dengan pendekatan saintifik (studi kasus di MI Negeri Cisambeng Majalengka). Tesis magister, tidak diterbitkan, UIN Sunan Kalijaga, Yogyakarta.

Hewitt, P. (1999). Conceptual Physics . The Physics Teacher. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.880288

Hewitt, P. G., Lyons, S. A., Suchocki, J. A., & Yeh, J. (2013). Conceptual Integrated Science: International Edition.

Lukum, A. (2015). EVALUASI PROGRAM PEMBELAJARAN IPA SMP MENGGUNAKAN MODEL COUNTENANCE STAKE. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Evaluasi Pendidikan. https://doi.org/10.21831/pep.v19i1.4552

Mendikbud. (2013). Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan RI Nomor 65, Tahun 2013, tentang Standar Proses Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah.

Mulyasa, E. (2015). Pengembangan dan implementasi kurikulum 2013. Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya.

Putri, R. F. (2016). Kemampuan guru fisika SMA Negeri di Kabupaten Sleman dalam menerapkan model-model pembelajaran yang ditentukan pada kurikulum 2013 serta kendala-kendala yang dihadapi. Tesis. Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta.

Stake, R. E. (1967). The Countenance of Educational Evaluation. Teachers College Record. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004

Sugiyono. (2014). Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: ALFABETA.

Syah, M. (2008). Psikologi pendidikan: dengan pendekatan baru. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.

Widiadnyana, Sadia, & Suastra. (2014). Pengaruh Model Discovery Learning Terhadap Pemahaman Konsep IPA dan Sikap Ilmiah Siswa SMP. E-Journal Program Pascasarjana Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha Program Studi IPA.

Widoyoko, S.E.P. (2015). Evaluasi program pembelajaran (panduan praktis bagi pendidik dan calon pendidik). Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Downloads

Additional Files

Published

2020-07-17

Issue

Vol. 11 No. 1 (2020)

Section

Articles

License

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication, with the work [SPECIFY PERIOD OF TIME] after publication simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.

 

2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.

 

3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).

 

Lisensi Creative Commons
LITERASI by http://ejournal.almaata.ac.id/index.php/LITERASI is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.