Hydrocolloids reduce nasal injuries in infants receiving CPAP: a systematic review

Siti Nur Ngaisah; Yeni Rustinah

doi:10.21927/jnki.2021.9(4).263-272

Hydrocolloids reduce nasal injuries in infants receiving CPAP: a systematic review

Siti Nur Ngaisah, Yeni Rustinah

Abstract

Background: CPAP is the standard oxygenation management in the respiratory emergencies in infants, complications such as nose injuries are still common. Recognizing risk factors and reducing the pressure which created between the adhesive interface and the nasal skin surface can prevent this complication

Objectives: The aims of this literature review is to determine the benefits of hydrocolloid dressing on nasal injury and comfort in infants with CPAP.

Methods: Systematic review, the articles search involved several online databases based on the PICO framework and focused on using PRISMA.

Results: 9 articles found according to the criteria. There are 3 main themes such as risk factors, the type of interface and barriers skin

Conclusions: nasal injury can be prevented by selecting the right interface and administering hydrocolloid as a barrier to reduces pressure at the interface.

Keywords

baby; cpap; hydrocoloid; skin breakdown

Full Text:

PDF

References

Al-Lawama M, Alkhatib H, Wakileh Z, Elqaisi R, AlMassad G, Badran E, et al. Bubble CPAP therapy for neonatal respiratory distress in level III neonatal unit in Amman, Jordan: A prospective observational study. Int J Gen Med. 2019;12:25–30.

Baldursdottir S, Falk M, Donaldsson S, Jonsson B, Drevhammar T. Basic principles of neonatal bubble CPAP: Effects on CPAP delivery and imposed work of breathing when altering the original design. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2020;105(5):550–4.

Lam R, Schilling D, Scottoline B, Platteau A, Niederhausen M, Lund KC, et al. The Effect of Extended Continuous Positive Airway Pressure on Changes in Lung Volumes in Stable Premature Infants: A Randomized Controlled Trial. J Pediatr [Internet]. 2020;217:66-72.e1. Available from:

http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022347619309825

Alqahtani JS, AlAhmari MD, Alqahtani S. Evidence based synthesis for prevention of noninvasive ventilation related facial pressure ulcers. Saudi Med J [Internet]. 2018;39(5):5. Available from: www.smj.org.sa

Xie L. Hydrocolloid dressing in preventing nasal trauma secondary to nasal continuous positive airway pressure in preterm infants. World J Emerg Med. 2014;5(3):218.Ribeiro, D. de F. C., Barros, F. S., Fernandes, B. L., Nakato, A. M., & Nohama, ‘Percy. (2020). Nasal prongs: Risks, injuries incidence and preventive approaches associated with their use in newborns. Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare, 13, 527–537. https://doi.org/10.2147/JMDH.S252017

Milligan PS, Goldstein MR, Neonatologist A. Implementation of an evidence-based non-invasive respiratory support ( NIRS ) bundle in the NICU to decrease nasal injury complications. J Neonatal Nurs [Internet]. 2017;23(2):89–98. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jnn.2016.05.003

Ribeiro D de FC, Barros FS, Fernandes BL, Nakato AM, Nohama ‘Percy. Nasal prongs: Risks, injuries incidence and preventive approaches associated with their use in newborns. J Multidiscip Healthc. 2020;13:527–37.

Bishopp, A., Oakes, A., Antoine-Pitterson, P., Chakraborty, B., Comer, D., & Mukherjee, R. (2019). The preventative effect of Hydrocolloid Dressings on nasal bridge pressure ulceration in Acute Non-Invasive Ventilation. The Ulster medical journal, 88(1), 17–20

Chen, C. Y., Chou, A. K., Chen, Y. L., Chou, H. C., Tsao, P. N., & Hsieh, W. S. (2017). Quality Improvement of Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Therapy in Neonatal Intensive Care Unit. Pediatrics and Neonatology, 58(3), 229–235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pedneo.2016.04.005

Newnam, K. M., McGrath, J. M., Salyer, J., Estes, T., Jallo, N., & Bass, W. T. (2015a). A comparative effectiveness study of continuous positive airway pressure-related skin breakdown when using different nasal interfaces in the extremely low birth weight neonate. AppliedNursing Research, 28(1), 36–41. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apnr.2014.05.005

Byram, S. K., Sivaramakrishna, Y., & Raju, M. S. (2019). Outcome of Bubble (CPAP) Continuous Positive Airway Pressure in Neonates with Respiratory Distress and its failure factors. International Journal of Contemporary Medical Research [IJCMR], 6(7), 11–13. https://doi.org/10.21276/ijcmr.2019.6.7.41

Bashir, T., Murki, S., Kiran, S., Reddy, V. K., & Oleti, T. P. (2019). “Nasal mask” in comparison with “nasal prongs” or “rotation of nasal mask with nasal prongs” reduce the incidence of nasal injury in preterm neonates supported on nasal continuous positive airway pressure (nCPAP): A randomized controlled trial. PLoS ONE, 14(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0211476

Maruccia, M., Ruggieri, M., & Onesti, M. G. (2015). Facial skin breakdown in patients with non-invasive ventilation devices: Report of two cases and indications for treatment and prevention. International Wound Journal, 12(4), 451–455. https://doi.org/10.1111/iwj.12135

Imbulana, D. I., Owen, L. S., Dawson, J. A., Bailey, J. L., Davis, P. G., & Manley, B. J. (2018). A Randomized Controlled Trial of a Barrier Dressing to Reduce Nasal Injury in Preterm Infants Receiving Binasal Noninvasive Respiratory Support. Journal of Pediatrics, 201, 34-39.e3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpeds.2018.05.026

Jabraeili, M., Mahallei, M., Arshadi, M., Mohammadpouras, A., Shamshiri, M., Salimi, Z., & Karimipoor, S. (2017). The efficacy of a protocolized nursing care on nasal skin breakdown in preterm neonates receiving nasal continuous positive airway pressure. International Journal of Pediatrics, 5(1), 4217–4225. https://doi.org/10.22038/ijp.2016.7875

Naha, N., Pournami, F., Prabhakar, J., & Jain, N. (2018). Nasal Injury with Continuous Positive Airway Pressure: Need for BPrivileging^ Nursing Staff. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12098-019-02960-1

Alligood, R. M. (2014). Nursing theorist and their work. United State of America: Mosby Elsevier.

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21927/jnki.2021.9(4).263-272