Implementasi ASCO (Analyzing, Solving Problems, ans Comparing) terhadap Pembelajaran Membaca Kritis

Authors

  • Nuria Reny Hariyati Akademi Farmasi Surabaya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21927/literasi.2019.10(2).92-98

Abstract

Abstract

Research on overcoming exposure to radical issues with critical thinking on critical reading learning is still rarely done. This research is important to be carried out in the reading of the story to avoid radical issues that have been entered in university by using the Asco method (Analyzing, Solving Problems, Comparing). This research approach uses the Quasi-Times Design Series with Control Group experiment. The research data collection, namely the initial test scores and final tests. The experimental group was B2-18 and the control group was B3-18. Data analysis of this study used the One Way Anova SPSS test for Windows with a significance level of <0.05. The results of this study, namely (1) A homogeneous group test of 0.049 which was declared valid because> 0.05 to test this relationship; (2) Anova test of the two groups of 0,000 was declared significant because <0.05. The results showed that there was a significant influence of Asco (Analyzing, Solving Problems, Comparing) on critical reading learning.

 

Keywords: Asco (Analyzing, Solving Problems, Comparing), Implementation, Critical   ReadingLearning

References

Ahmadi, Anas. 2019. The use of Sinta (Science and Technology Index) Database to Map the Development of Literature Study in Indonesia, International Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Technology, 10(02): 918–923.

Ahmadi, A., Abd. Syukur Ghazali, Taufik Dermawan, and Maryaeni. 2019. "Ecopsychology and Psychology of Literature: Concretization of Human Biophilia That Loves the Environment in Two Indonesian Novels." The International Journal of Literary Humanities 17 (1): 47-59. doi:10.18848/2327-7912/CGP/v17i01/47-59.

Ahyar, M. (2015). Membaca Gerakan Islam Radikal dan Deradikalisasi Gerakan Islam. Walisongo: Jurnal Penelitian Sosial Keagamaan, 23(1), p.1.

Alem, Y. T. (2019). Critical Reflection as Motivational Strategy of Learning Critical Reading. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 10(4), 683. doi: 10.17507/jltr.1004.03.

Allen, T. (2019). Narrative design thinking. Solving Critical Design Problems, 171–183. doi: 10.4324/9780429398872-12.

Atanasova, G. (2019). Students’ Critical Thinking Skills Improvement Via Algorithmic Problems Solving. EDULEARN19 Proceedings. doi: 10.21125/edulearn.2019.2079.

Baek Jiyeon and Choi Jin Oh (2012). The Effects of a Reading Comprehension Monitoring Strategy on Critical Reading, Reading Efficacy, and Reading Attitudes. Journal of Research in Curriculum Instruction, 16(2), pp.421-439.

Chittooran, M. M. (2015). Reading and Writing for Critical Reflective Thinking. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 2015(143), 79–95. doi: 10.1002/tl.20137.

Eva Farhah, I. (2017). Gerakan Islam Radikal dan Terorisme di Indonesia: Kajian Terhadap Upaya Integrasi Bangsa. Jurnal CMES, 6(2), p.124.

Ham, V. V. D. (2016). Reading with a critical mindset. Analyzing a Case Study, 17–18. doi: 10.1007/978-1-137-56621-8_5.

Hariyati, N. and Septiana, H. (2019). Effectiveness of Critical Thinking about Radicalism Issue (CTRI) on Critical Reading Activities: A Quasi Experimental Study. International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding, 6(3), p.1055.

Hariyati, N. and Syakur, A. (2018). Penerapan Strategi Membaca Kritis di Akademi Farmasi Surabaya untuk Menunjang Kecakapan Literasi Menuju Era Revolusi Industri 4.0. Makalah disajikan pada Seminar Nasional Edusaintek: Pembelajaran Kolaborasi Berbasis ICT Menuju Era Revolusi Industri 4.0. Unimus. Hal 450-455.

Holm, N. (2018). Critical capital: cultural studies, the critical disposition and critical reading as elite practice. Cultural Studies, pp.1-24.

Paikah, N. (2019). Kedudukan dan Fungsi Badan Nasional Penanggulangan Terorisme (BNPT) Dalam Pemberantasan Terorisme di Indonesia. Al-Adalah: Jurnal Hukum dan Politik Islam, 4(1), pp.1-20.

Reichenberg, M. (2012). Special issue Reading: A critical conceptual analysis. Comments on five contributions. L1 Education Studies in Language and Literature, 11(Reading: A critical analysis), pp.91-96.

Robinson (2017). Marx after post-narratives: a critical reading of Ronaldo Munck’s critical reading of Marx. Global Discourse, 7(4), pp.602-608.

Taufik, M. (2015). Pandangan Kritis Islam Liberal atas Isu-Isu Kontemporer. Al-Banjari : Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu-Ilmu Keislaman, 14(1).

ZA, T. (2014). Isu-Isu Kritis dalam Pendidikan Islam Perspektif Pedagogik Kritis. Jurnal Ilmiah Islam Futura, 13(2), p.250.

Zou, D. (2016). Comparing Dictionary-induced Vocabulary Learning and Inferencing in the Context of Reading. Lexikos, 26(1). doi: 10.5788/26-1-1345.

Downloads

Published

2019-12-31

Issue

Vol. 10 No. 2 (2019)

Section

Articles

License

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication, with the work [SPECIFY PERIOD OF TIME] after publication simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.

 

2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.

 

3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).

 

Lisensi Creative Commons
LITERASI by http://ejournal.almaata.ac.id/index.php/LITERASI is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.